Cinematography:
Ben NottComposer:
Peter SpierigCast:
Helen Mirren, Jason Clarke, Sarah Snook, Angus Sampson, Laura Brent, Eamon Farren, Finn Scicluna-O'Prey, Bruce Spence, Emily Wiseman, Graham JahneVOD (1)
Plots(1)
Inspired by true events. On an isolated stretch of land 50 miles outside of San Francisco sits the most haunted house in the world. Built by Sarah Winchester (Helen Mirren), heiress to the Winchester fortune, it is a house that knows no end. Constructed in an incessant twenty-four hour a day, seven day a week mania for decades, it stands seven stories tall and contains hundreds of rooms. To the outsider it looks like a monstrous monument to a disturbed woman’s madness. But Sarah is not building for herself, for her niece (Sarah Snook) or for the brilliant Doctor Eric Price (Jason Clarke) whom she has summoned to the house. She is building a prison, an asylum for hundreds of vengeful ghosts, and the most terrifying among them have a score to settle with the Winchesters... (Lionsgate UK)
(more)Reviews (6)
This is a completely different kind of ghost horror movie than what I was used to in the past few years. This one is – how should I put it – more fantastically wacky. It doesn’t put much emphasis on whether it’s realistic at all. This is not me saying that any other ghost horror movie is realistic. The movie is literally playing with the screenplay, the plot and the house of old Winchesters in such a way that you have no idea what is going to happen in the next scene. If the technical execution wasn’t so good, I would almost say that this is a C-list flick. In this case, however, I didn’t even mind that much.
()
The best thing about the film is the idea, which unfortunately the Spierigs dealt with without anything above standard. A collection of jump scares without a proper build-up of tension, the pace towards the end is a bit slow, and the finale is more weird than scary... Helen Mirren tries to maintain her dignity, so she's as stiff as a board, whilst Jason Clarke is the only one who performs his "rational Laudianism" with grace. The film doesn't offend, but those 99 minutes don't offer anything that would wake you up from a dream.
()
Crap from head to toe, it would Winchester himself to shame. The trailer a few months ago had me hyped up for a gothic horror film with an unusual setting and decent actors, and the Spierig brothers gave me hope as I liked their Jigsaw, but this was really, really bad. The acting was solid though. Helen Mirren and Jason Clarke are both above average actors for the horror genre, and visually it's not downright bad either, but to make such an impressive house so uninteresting and especially lacking in atmosphere is really a shame. The film has no atmosphere whatsoever, not a single scare is functional (if you are an experienced viewer, of course), even the teenage girls behind me were yawning and that's saying something. If James Wan had taken up a similar material we could have had another potential Insidious, but have the useless film of the year that is more boring than scary and after a long time I regret the money I spent going to the cinema 40%.
()
A horror with classic editing with everything, including excellent actors. I don't even have to mention Helen Mirren, but I was very pleased by Jason Clarke, who I want to see in roles like this and not in the Terminator films, thank you very much. In addition to them, Winchester has an (un)pleasantly ghostly atmosphere, and a few really successful and artfully escalated jump scares that do not feel cheap, and it is also (for a horror film) thoughtful, and it uses in the end what it indicates in the introduction. I liked the relatively unpredictable atmosphere as well - the whole thing could have turned out any way possible (even worse).
()
Let's face it, this wasn't a horror film. It was built around silly scare scenes that would have worked on me if I was ten and it was getting dark outside. There was no chance of me being scared now. It was a shame that the film didn't have better writing and direction, because the actors certainly weren't to blame for the poor result. The constant rebuilding and finishing of the house reminded me of the much better Rose Red based on King's novel.
()
Winchester has moments that are classic jump scares that can work. But can someone explain to me how the Spierig brothers managed to make a film about such a bizarre mansion that actually exists, but were unable to give it any sort of atmosphere? Even the movie poster has that vibe, but Helen Mirren in black simply isn't enough. This didn't work out and it’s just a horror B-movie that doesn't entice with anything.
()
Ads