The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1

It's not smarter than the previous parts in the series, just more talkative. It's not even fun. The story has disappeared, and the development of Katniss and Peeta's relationship, which held the first and second parts above water, is sidelined. I've never been a fan of Panem's world, and I really don't have anything to lean on here. Overall impression: 25%. It seems to me that the whole series mentally corresponds to the world of 12-16-year-old teenagers, and it is questionable whether this stretched filler can satisfy them... (31/01/2022)

Worse than the second film. Verbose, with very little action, and unnecessarily political. And there was all this fuss about it, even the new song by Lorde turned out to be unnecessary. It is incomprehensible how Jennifer Lawrence, compared to the excellently coherent and well-paced second installment, stumbled so badly and made a typically arrogant and tearful Hollywood shlock that lacks all the ingredients that made the second film a better one. A leap back to mediocrity with one single inventive moment – the chimney falling on the building. (07/12/2014)

The first Mockingjay is one of the most typical blockbusters in the history of Hollywood. The second most commercially successful film in the Unites States in 2014 and the fifth in the given year in worldwide box-office revenues is completely devoid of money shots, epic scenes and bombastic action sequences. Its two-hour runtime predominantly comprises dialogue scenes, as most of the film takes place in an underground bunker and all of the characters wear baggy coveralls. Here the filmmakers can afford to do what would be commercial suicide anywhere else thanks to the fact that this is a feature-length exposition for the climax, which will come in the second film. The knowledge that, thanks to its title, the film will automatically be a hit regardless of what happens in it gave rise to the film saga’s crucial episode. Instead of a seasonal spectacle, we have here a film that appeals exclusively to adolescent audiences, but instead of the formulaicness and superficiality that is associated with this target group on the part of overly clever old people and pragmatic producers, it relates a narrative from an Orwellian grey world that uncovers deceit and media manipulation, showing the heroine fumbling her way between her own interests and the intentions of others, while offering no resolution of the conflicts that have arisen. (26/06/2016)

I was going into the third Hunger Games movie with respect. I might have even been a little bit afraid. The first one had a premise that was really enjoyable. The second one had a combination of an arena fighting and politics, which enthused me far less, and after watching it, it was clear that the third one would be pure war and politics, which is something I was afraid of. But in the end, it wasn’t that bad. There was politics, but it was bearable. An array of amazing action scenes often came to the rescue, as well as the actors who obviously enjoyed it immensely. Especially Moore and Hoffman whose roles I’ll never forget. I must even admit that even though this movie had a lot of flaws, I’m excited to see the final instalment. (22/06/2015)

Hunger games without the games. Relatively slow pace and two hours of melodrama without any benefit. I found the visuals too mediocre for such a high budget, and slightly digital (compared to Divergent, which was beautifully visually varied and exciting from start to finish, Mockingjay - Part 1 is severely lacking). For me, kind of unsatisfying in almost every aspect. Average and the weakest episode, let's see what the finale has to say. 55% (21/02/2015)