Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

The most sophisticated spy picture of all time. But beneath all the distant sleekness, it is seething. By focusing on "irrelevant" details, Alfredson is able to create a complex storyline that in other films would require long minutes of dialog and an explanatory voice-over monolog. Here, a stubborn silence is maintained, and only rarely a cursory sentence is uttered, seemingly about nothing. And that's the biggest positive (and for many, the biggest negative). If you're on the same page with the film, in the silent scenes where the two Englishmen look at each other over a cup of tea, you'll be on the edge of your seat, covered in sweat, because "you know he knows that him over there knows" and there's no need for it to be mentioned through dialog. If you don’t catch this movie train or if leaves without you then you'll have long minutes waiting for you, watching two Englishmen looking at each other with cups of tea in their hands, and you’ll get nothing out of it. The borderline is thin, but it separates one of the most powerful experiences of recent years from one of the most boring experiences of recent years. So, it is hardly a film for everyone, but at least because of the unusually confident and stylish “70s" directing, it’s worth seeing. Also because it is a prime example of how to adapt a complex and extensive book; it is not a slavish copy nor a mere illustration, but a real adaptation fully transformed into cinematic language. (16/08/2014)

Those who have Gary Oldman fixed as a demonic expressive representative of the most abhorrent villains will probably be surprised by the gray inconspicuous clerk, who shows no traces of charisma, yet enlightens us about the complex espionage game, which seems to me like a very realistic portrayal of the real world of intelligence games. I say about a certain category of films that they are excellent, but only for some people. That's exactly the case with this drama. It is a precise film with a well-thought-out story and sophisticated details, which, however, with its pace and deliberate avoidance of proven genre clichés and attractiveness for the viewer, rather discourages the average film consumer. I would say that it has the potential to become a classic of its genre, whose name will be pronounced with respect by film connoisseurs and genre specialists, but it certainly won't become a box office hit in the true sense of the word. Gary Oldman's performance impressed me, as well as the screenplay, which includes several real elements from the famous scandal surrounding the legendary spy and double agent Kim Philby, who, as a high-ranking officer of the British secret service, even aspired to the position of its chief while being controlled as a mole from Moscow for many years. The technical aspects of the film and the direction are precise, and those who are not deterred by the slow pace and lack of action will be rewarded with a great cinematic experience. Overall impression: 95%. (06/02/2012)

It’s actually an absolutely brilliant espionage drama, but you have to watch it second by second, detail by detail. Only at that point that it stands out, and it’s hard to enjoy it when you’re tired from the day’s work and you look forward to sinking into your armchair in the evening, when this movie starts playing. That’s actually what I did and it wasn’t quite right. At times I was passing out from the fatigue while watching and despite the perfect acting performances, I was aware of the fact that it was boring and that the movie dragged. But what drags cannot run away, so there finally came the end which absolutely uplifted the whole movie, because like a proper espionage movie, it managed to surprise me several times. (03/04/2013)

James Bond took a real beating because this is what I imagine a proper spy film to be like. You won’t find many action sequences here, but instead, a well-thought-out plot with a dense atmosphere that will have you glued to your seat the entire time, along with a star-studded cast where everyone competes to outdo each other (with Gary Oldman and Mark Strong being the best). Tomas Alfredson appeared on my radar out of nowhere, and suddenly, he’s shining like a beacon, as if to say I should start paying attention to him. As I’ve already emphasized, this is mostly about believable and slow storytelling where you really need to stay sharp because you can’t miss even the smallest detail (you’ll hear so many different names and see so many actors that it’ll make your head spin). I’m not saying I understood everything 100%, but I’m not criticizing the film for that in any way, because it tries to lay everything out clearly and thoroughly for the viewer. The 70s vibe emanates from every shot, and it’s clear that an experienced pro was behind the camera. On top of that, otherworldly music plays throughout. A few times, I got chills down my spine, and overall, the film convinced me that being an agent like this takes courage we can’t even imagine. The mole’s elimination at the end with a small-caliber gun, accompanied by that otherworldly music, tied everything together. A spy thriller you can’t afford to let slip through your fingers. I give it 91%. (19/07/2017)

The direction is precise, with attention to details, even the unimportant ones when Alfredson is just playing around (a wasp in a car, a killed owl in a classroom), but otherwise the narrative is too distant and not very immersive. Gary Oldman displays an excruciating ease with silent glances and considered speeches, and is the brightest point of the entire film. Of course, there have been better spy plots. (27/01/2012)