The Lovely Bones

The cast, with my favourites Susan Sarandon and Rachel Weisz under the direction of one of the best directors of our time, and an original theme with a strong story to boot. I just had to see it! And I'm glad I did! After the Lord of the Rings trilogy, Peter Jackson is still on a roll and The Lovely Bones really kept my eyes glued to the screen. I've known since Titanic that even if you know too much about the plot, you can still be captivated by the film. And it happened! Stanley Tucci is as sleazy and convincing a pedophile as Jackie Jackie Earle Haley in Little Children. Susan Sarandon delighted me as the energetic and distracted grandmother, and Rachel Weisz's performance did too. And Saoirse Ronan is one of the most talented child stars for me after this film. Jackson blends dark thriller and family drama with imaginative fantasy to great effect, and the result is a unique film of high quality. As far as the technical execution is concerned, they have done it perfectly – a complete audiovisual orgy. In short, a real cinematic experience that got me both with its story and its execution. (21/07/2010)

Jackson may be one of the filmmakers who can make whatever they want, but with this film, he has cruelly missed the mark. He has drowned a completely bland and uninteresting story in kitschy images that stink of plastic and are put on the captions of the Watchtower by the Jehovah's Witnesses. Only three things are decent: a) the haughtily sleazy Stanley Tucci, b) the arrival of the mother-in-law, and c) the spy in the house. The rest of the film, though not boring through and through, is a desperately empty spectacle. 2 ½. (01/03/2010)

In short, weird. Jackson is a good director, but the story jumps from one level to another too often and so it’s hard for the viewer to build a sufficiently strong bond with any of them. Visually exquisite and emotionally very strong scene from “purgatory" sometimes contrast weirdly with the “real world" (yes, mainly with smokey Susan Sarandon), but despite it all, Jackson manages to hold it all together. Sometimes it isn’t about what story you tell, but how you tell it. (17/04/2010)

A genre mishmash, emotional turmoil, perfect actors, and most importantly, an unexpected spectacle. Peter Jackson has created an entirely intimate story where even the most magnificent special effects shot remains a personal desire. Plot-wise, it may suffice with the simplest premise, but the tension, tears, and magnificent camera did not even let me properly think about it. A complex and evolving experience. (06/01/2010)

I'm not familiar with the book, but the film The Lovely Bones strikes me as a very strange combination of several completely different films, a kind of cat and mouse that is lucky to have good actors in it. It's the most interesting spectacle ever while the main character (Saoirse Ronan and those eyes of hers!) is alive, and then whenever the unusually slimy Stanley Tucci is doing something. The scenes from the afterlife landscape seemed to me rather self-serving and it seems that Peter Jackson just needed to cram digital magic in somewhere. Completely out of place was Susan Sarandon's comical grandmother's interjection, not to mention the unbelievably stupid ending. The biggest unlucky thing about this film, though, is that it offers so many comparisons to What Dreams May Come all the time. And it simply could not come out of such a comparison well, not even if it was better. (25/10/2015)