Harsh Times

Christian Bale proves right from the beginning that he is a method actor and really immerses himself in the role. In this case, it means we are watching a genuinely unpleasant person who will irritate you from the beginning, and you'll hope that things end badly for him. And you might not care that his behavior could be partly attributed to the war. Jim's an asshole. No, this just isn't a movie I could like. Characters with whom it is impossible to identify. I like that the film goes its own way, but I didn't find my way to it. The story isn't even that interesting. (26/02/2014)

Ayer is quite a specific director, one you have to develop a taste for. What I appreciate about his work is his ability to create a film that pulls you into the corruption of the police or other institutions, showing the dark sides of society so convincingly that it occasionally gives you chills. Harsh Times is a very low-budget film, which is surprising, and I'm even more astonished by the overall impact of the film, which left a strong impression on me. Yes, the main anchor is Bale, there’s no debating that. What he can portray is beyond my understanding. He’s a perfect example of how a top-tier actor can play any character. Jim David is someone you wouldn’t want to be friends with—a disturbed, aggressive man with a desire to kill is not someone you want to upset, because it will simply end badly for you. The close-up shots focusing on his facial expressions were disarming; I’m surprised he wasn’t nominated for some kind of award. There’s no action in the film, but the tense moments make up for it. I expected there would be no chance of a peaceful ending here. It clearly built towards a finale where the protagonist would be left in ruins. But he brought it upon himself. I would just tweak the ending a bit, as it was too open. More psychological thrillers like Harsh Times, please. 78%. (21/10/2017)

Disappointment. After Ayer's perfect Street Kings, I was expecting another LA street hell, but I wasn't able to get past the contrivance. Plus, I wasn't buying Bale's acting in this one, and his constant use of language from the motherfucker tribe seemed overdone. The graphic depiction of the loss of self-control is just extra too, and in general it's all rather abbreviated. Ayer simply didn't have a sure directorial hand yet. (06/12/2010)

Ayer's attempt to be rough, impactful, and vulgar at all costs perhaps works initially. Then Bale’s style, however perfectly acted, in which he tries to emulate the style of Mexican gangsters, becomes significantly irritating. The problem stems from the director/writer, whose mix of street gangster and personal testimony of a war-scarred veteran shatters into an obnoxiously chatty and overwrought routine. Hands off this one, you'll have much more fun playing "GTA: San Andreas." It’s on the same level in terms of ideas and yet you'll be in the thick of it at will, not for an annoying two hours. (12/10/2007)

The story itself isn't great, and Ayer's direction isn't exactly bursting with ideas and character, but the film has one huge plus that elevates it from the grey of mediocrity, and that’s Christian Bale, of course. Something evil and mysterious lurks in his eyes, which from the very first moments will unsettle you and help you immerse in the otherwise bland plot. And Ayer manages to dose all that evil in the span of 110 minutes in such a way as to make everyone sit on their asses and watch. If you don't expect anything groundbreaking, harsh or deep in thought, you'll have a great time. (03/02/2013)