Payback

Mel Gibson did a hell of a job in this one. He’s tough, cool, rough, his mouth is full of great lines and he’s about to finish what he’d started. This is one hell of a payback. It actually doesn’t matter how Mel is going to go about is, what’s important is that he shoots enough bullets and that there are tons of dead bodies around him. It’s as simple as that. It might be a bit of a wannabe cool over-filtered action ride, but other than that it’s a wacky movie in the vein of Tarantino, which will keep you entertained for those almost two hours. (28/02/2014)

Helgeland managed a fairly decent mix of the gritty dude, Lethal Weapon, and the Tarantino crude gangster poetics, in which brutality is sort of danced, humorous, casual. Payback is no directorial opus magni - it is a rather routine film, which owes most of its great moments to the script and to the excellent Mel Gibson, who capitalized on his many years of experience in detective Riggs' skin, only to stand on the opposite side of the barricade. Thanks to him the incredibly stubborn thief Porter becomes a character almost humorously dangerous, who, with raw willfulness, walks through the reinforced concrete barricade for the smallest thing. The central character is the central value of Payback. We otherwise do not find anything particularly original or memorable here, everything works for the benefit of the whole and the result is a quality gangster film from the rough school that delights even with its decent ending. (29/11/2005)

The brutality suits noir-themed crime stories quite well. On a journey for revenge, Mel Gibson, as a tough guy with a steel gaze, loves a beautiful prostitute, seeks out a traitor, and encounters – uh – a sadistic dominatrix leading an Asian gang. I can't remember the last time I used that word, but Payback is a cool movie, with a perfect cold look, and some scenes are amazingly uncompromising in their brutality, but unfortunately, everything is always just tough, and throughout the whole time, I didn't experience any significant twist that would have affected me in any way. Brian Helgeland relies on stylish form, but the essence constantly eludes him. (11/06/2007)

A brilliantly built-up thriller with a pace that is simply unreal in the second half. And yet so little is enough... Just steal $140,000 (no, sorry, just $70,000) from Mel Gibson and you'll unleash the kind of carousel of murders, shootouts and badass one-liners that we only remember from the first Die Hard. Gibson shines in his role and enjoys it to the fullest, but the supporting characters are also given a memorable portrayal by the actors, whether I'm thinking of the bad guys Henry, Kristofferson and Coburn or the pretty sharp hooker Lucy Liu. Simple, straightforward, harsh – just the way it should be. (23/07/2012)

I really didn’t expect this to be such a stylized hit. I usually associate Brian Helgeland with quality screenplays, but here he not only took on the director’s chair but also created an incredibly old-school detective film in every way. Mel Gibson fit the lead role perfectly; his character, Porter, took his quest for revenge (which is more principled than personal) perhaps a bit too seriously, ruthlessly eliminating one villain after another. However, he can’t be classified as a hero; rather, quite the opposite (he hardly smiles throughout the film, making him someone you’d prefer to stay on good terms with at all costs). The dark blue filter had a certain visual appeal; at times, I wondered if the film was inspired by a comic book. The film also doesn’t lack originality, offering a few carefully crafted plot twists that genuinely surprised me. By the end, it picked up considerable pace, with perfect one-liners escalating exponentially, and I’m simply amazed. In terms of the genre, few films can compete with it; such a stylish, dark noir crime film is a rare sight. I give it 87%. (06/05/2019)